VIDEO ANSWER
Aquablation: effective, yes, but how safe?
Playing the video connects to YouTube in privacy-enhanced mode.
Subtitle text
Source: subtitles embedded in the published video.
Text from the published subtitles. Coverage may be partial; consult the video for the full context.
prostatic tissue. It's presented as a precision robotic technique that is independent of the surgeon. The data is mixed regarding its efficacy. The urinary improvement results are good, comparable to transurethral resection, and that's how I conceptualise it.
It's a cavitational technique that removes tissue, similar to when a transurethral resection is performed. But regarding safety, there are studies showing significantly higher rates of serious complications than with enucleation.
A study published in twenty twenty-four comparing Aquablation with HoLEP showed thirty-seven point five percent Clavien-Dindo grade three b or higher complications with Aquablation versus four point two percent with HoLEP.