VIDEO ANSWER

TURP: understanding the risk of another operation

Dr. Fernando Gómez Sancha · Urologist · Medical Director of ICUA

Video published: · 0:22 · Excerpt 1:13–1:36

Playing the video connects to YouTube in privacy-enhanced mode.

How to interpret retreatment figures

Retreatment rates depend on what counts as another intervention and on the follow-up period. A percentage without a stated follow-up cannot be directly compared with rates at five or ten years.

At five years, Epic Cosmos (2026) reported surgical retreatment of 4.4% for HoLEP/ThuLEP combined and 7.1% for TURP. This is an unadjusted observational comparison between groups; it does not establish superiority for every patient.

Editorial clarification based on the cited sources. It does not establish a new medical review of the video.

Subtitle text

Automatic YouTube captions; they may contain errors.

Text from the published subtitles. Coverage may be partial; consult the video for the full context.

It's a technique that most urologists know and have mastered. The problem is in larger prostates, resection is incomplete by definition, almost by definition, and the 10-year reoperation rate is between 15 and 20%. In other words, for every five or six patients who undergo a transurethral resection, one will need surgery again.